According to dianacooper.com The Grail dynasties were started on Atlantis by Melchizedek – who as we learned, was an incarnation of the Logos. This website’s author says that the Melchizedekean temples served as birthing grounds for the first Grail blood lineages founded on Earth. My understanding is that the importance of the Grail lines is that they contain light codes within their dna. I believe there was a re-infusion of the light codes at the time of the white Adam in the Caucasus and then at various stages in the line of the biblical patriarchs, who looked like ‘angel children’. This sites author says that Jesus came to re-vivify these codes, which could only mean that they are handed down genetically. There were initially twelve branches or lines perpetuated. Ms. Cooper relates that the Grail families, “were men and women who lived their lives in service to God through humanity.” They were, “spiritual magicians who used their powers selflessly to promote the Christic Presence in the world.” She relates that their places of worship included an outer hall where the history of the Melchizedekean generations was recorded. So as you can see, we have been keeping track of our genealogy for a long time!
The book I’ve found that holds the most information on the Grail family lineages is Guardians of the Holy Grail. Since it’s so all-inclusive I will be referencing information from that book for the majority of this post. I will also add my comments within the material.
One appellation of the Grail kings was ‘Fisher Kings’. This symbolism is the same that came down to Jesus who was a ‘Fisher of Men’. They were also called ‘Righteous Shepherds’, another symbol we see in the stories of the Davidic bloodline.
According to the author of Guardians of the Holy Grail;
“These early priest kings of our planet’s sacred history were renowned for their supernatural power and penetrating wisdom; and their exalted status was reflected in their uniquely telling emblems, such as dragons, serpents, and lions, which are symbolic of the Kundalini life force they embodied. Their emblems also included various Holy Grail manifestations, including the spear, cup, sword, and platter or stone, which are collectively known to us as the Hallows of the Grail Castle and understood to denote the royal powers of discrimination, intuition, and the accumulation and dissemination of supernatural power. The Fisher Kings have also been identified with the symbol of a fish, which represented them as Kundalini masters swimming within the cosmic sea of life-force that surrounds and interpenetrates our universe.”
The first Fisher king on Lemuria was known as both Murrugan and Sanat or as some say – Satan. One of his brothers was Sananda Kumara who was the same soul as manifested in Jesus. Another name for the Fisher Kings is Priest Kings. They are understood to be the incarnations of the good/bad sons of our Mother the Holy Spirit. Another title for the Fisher Kings that is often used is the Green Man. Since this is a dualistic universe we live in, just as we humans have the capacity for great evil and great virtue, so does the Fisher King. His manifestations can be evil, or benign, or beneficent, or a combination thereof. He can be a saint or a demon, a Christ or a Lucifer. Since this applies to the ‘sons’ of the Goddess, so too can this be said of the Goddess herself – as hard as that is to fathom. This is reflected in the Holy Spirit’s three modes of creation, preservation and destruction.
“If a Fisher king desires to hold onto his Grail Hallows the ultimate lesson he must learn is ‘whom the Grail serves’, otherwise he will lose his power and one or more of his Grail Hallows is likely to be destroyed, stolen or disappear. The Holy Spirit power that moves through a Fisher King is not for himself alone, but everyone, and unless the monarch comes to this understanding he will undergo a fall and his subjects will suffer. Once a Fisher King falls, only after being asked by a thoughtful visitor to his Grail Castle, “whom does the Grail serve?” can the monarch expect to be redeemed and regain his power. This question will ostensibly trigger within a fallen Fisher King some innate wisdom about the Grail and how his selfishness and pride has led to his demise.”
The author relates that the Fisher King is beneficent at the beginning of his reign, but succumbs to pride and self-centeredness midway through his reign. In the Grail legends, when the Fisher King is not doing well, he becomes physically disabled in some way. In the European legends, the Fisher King has an injury to his groin – which some attribute to the fact that his wife, the Goddess has been taken from him. In this state, the Fisher Kings kingdom turns dark and decays. The author points to the book of Revelation which shows Lucifer’s manifestation as the Life-Force where, as the ‘red dragon’ a universal symbol of the fiery life force – Lucifer is tossed out of Heaven by St. Michael. According to the author;
“Lucifer was not originally considered evil. During the matriarchal era Green Man Lucifer was the Son of the Goddess, the embodiment of the Life Force, and the controller of her two powers of creation and destruction. His so-called ‘evil’ nature was first exploited during the inception of the categorical and divisive thinking that characterized the rise of patriarchal theology. At that time the Green Man was split into two Sons of the Goddess, with Lucifer associated with her power of destruction and his twin brother, who eventually became known as the Christ, the guardian of her power of creation.
…When Lucifer first became the King of the World, he was a righteous monarch. The Prophet Ezekiel recounts that Lucifer began his reign as the anointed cherub who was perfect in his ways and set upon the holy mountain of God (Ezekial 28:14-15). (Called the King of Tyre here and was tainted by becoming rich from trade and by his good looks) …The Koran is another scripture which, like the Holy Bible, is explicit in identifying the cause of Lucifer’s infamous fall in the Garden of Eden. This holy text maintains that following God’s creation of Adam, the angels that had descended to Earth from Heaven were instructed to surround the newborn son of Earth and to “Bow down to Adam.” All of them complied except for the rebellious Lucifer, who as Iblis ‘was haughty’.”
In India and Sri Lanka, Murrugan/Satan, is known as the androgynous divine son of Shiva and Shakti. In Atlantis he was Neptune. To the Arabs, he is Al Khadir. In India, one manifestation was King Nahusha – a name which denotes ‘serpent’. King Nahusha let his supernatural abilities inflate his ego, as so many other Fisher Kings have done, so he is remembered as one of their most demonic monarchs. His descendants were also fallen and are known as the Asuras, or the ‘fallen angels’. What’s important to remember is that the Primal Serpent manifests in humans who are subject to all the temptations and weaknesses all humans are subject to. If I understand correctly, there can be multiple manifestations of the Fisher King at the same time. Anyone whose spiritual level can attain it are manifestations of the Fisher King. They can reign as a ‘Christ’ or a ‘Lucifer’.
We go now to ancient Mesopotamia and Enki (Sumerian) or Ea (Babylonian) the ‘Lord of the Earth,’ the ‘House of Water,’ and ‘Lord of the Two Streams’. Enki’s capital city in Sumeria was Eridu. According to the ancient historian Berossus, Enki took form as Oannes who reputedly had a fish’s head atop a human head, a fish’s body with a man’s feet adjoined to a fish’s tail! Some liken this to ceremonial regalia. In fact, they say that the headdress worn by the Catholic Pope and Cardinals were modeled after the fish’s head of Enki/Oannes which sat atop his human head. The ancient Greek historian Apollodorus evidently believed that Oannes and his entourage really did look as described. He called them the Annedoti, the ‘Repulsive Ones’. According to Pinkham the Annedoti have “since been associated with the Anunnaki.”
I don’t understand why there would be an association of a fish-like creature with a serpent-like creature, it could be that Enki was some sort of combination of both. Pinkham says that some researchers believe their original homeland was either Sirius or Venus. He says that Enki/Oannes founded a lineage of Fisher Kings that included, “ten pre-flood monarchs known both as the Ab-Gal, the ‘Masters of Knowledge,’ as well as the ‘Seven Sages’.” Pinkham cites the Biblical Adam, Enoch and Noah as having been Fisher Kings in the lineage of Enki. I believe those ten pre-flood monarchs might have been Adam, Seth, Enos, Cainan, Mahaleel, Jared, Enoch, Methuselah, Lamech and Noah.
Pinkham cites King Nimrod as being an example of a fallen Fisher King due to his inflated ego. He declared himself to be God on Earth. Nimrod is credited with being the king who oversaw the building of the Tower of Babel as related in the Bible. One legend relates that he had the tower built in order to do battle with God for bringing the Flood upon the Earth. According to Pinkham; “His inglorious reign came to its conclusion after the megalomaniac king received a prophetic vision of the prophet Abraham re-establishing the religion of the one God in the future. In order to protect his rule, Nimrod slew all the firstborn sons of the Babylonians just in case one of them happened to be the infant Abraham. Because he fell so far from his pride, King Nimrod is rightly regarded as having been a legitimate manifestation of the Fisher King Vulcan-Lucifer.”
In the Book of Jasher, written by Moses’ staff bearer, the story of Nimrod’s edict of killing the firstborn sons is told. In that text, Abraham’s father Terah can’t bear to allow Abraham to be killed, so he substituted a son of one of his servants. Abraham and his mother went into hiding and lived in a cave for some ten years. Afterwards, Abraham went to live with Shem and Noah and was taught the true religion of the One God. After the Flood of Noah, as the Bible briefly mentions, there were still giants on the Earth. Those giants included Nimrod, Ham, Japheth and other Biblical characters. It was the time of the Anakim and Rephilim of the Bible. Pinkham relates that when Nimrod died, the ruler-ship of the Middle East was placed principally in the hands of King Melchizedek and the Rephilim and Anakim, “the giant descendants of the early Sons of God.” We know that those giants are still around – and living within the Earth. Our beloved Zorra is one of them.
One author wrote that the angels were given charge of the Earth they had almost destroyed. That was the time when the seventy sons of God were made to rule over the seventy people or languages of the Earth as depicted in the Bible. Cain also founded a lineage, which continued – contrary to the Noah’s Ark story that makes it seem like all of Cain’s line died out. Pinkham says that Cain’s line, called ‘Possessors,’ embodied the spirit of Vulcan-Lucifer. He says that the Fisher King lineage founded by Cain went to Enoch, then Lamech and to Noah and that Noah passed it to his son Ham. The alternate, Biblical version shows the descent to Noah, from Seth to Seth’s son Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel, Jared, Enoch, Methuselah, Lamech and then to Noah. It may be that all this confusion goes back to what Helena Blavatsky termed the disfigured allegories of the race of Cain and Noah and his family that came out of Atlantis.
The reason I’m including these points is because it does seem that the Freemasons follow a line that descends from Cain. We also learned earlier from Alice Linsley that Cain married his cousin who was a daughter of Enoch, who was a son of Seth. I believe this may account for the similarity in the bloodlines of Seth and Cain listed in the Bible. The lines were joined from the start – although I will say that in the Bible, Seth’s son is given as Enosh – a difference in spelling of just one letter. I believe this is part of the confusion. I have seen authors who state that both sides, Seth’s and Cain’s swore they would never marry with each other because Cain slew Abel or because Cain’s line was ‘superior’, but I believe they inter-married quite early. Pinkham wrote regarding this bloodline;
“Abraham whose original name, Ab-ram denoted “Possessor of Fire.” Abraham, a priest of Ur, when called by Yahweh to father a race of ‘chosen ones’, received much of his power from the Fisher King Melchizedek by “drinking from his chalice.” King Melchizedek, whose name King of Salem (or Shalem) denotes “King of Venus,” is recognized in the Arab world as a manifestation of Al-Khadir, the Green Man, who was both the Son of Venus and primal king of the World. The Water of Life Abraham received from King Melchizedek was subsequently transmitted to all the tribes of Israel, especially the Tribes of Levi and David out of which emerged the Hebrew priests and Fisher Kings.”
The Water of Life referred to is our Mother the Holy Spirit’s power. We learned earlier that Melchizedek was an incarnation of the Logos. We also learned that some say that Melchizedek was Shem. The edict of Nimrod’s to kill the first-born sons had, in hindsight, assured that Abraham had been taught by Melchizedek/Shem the truth about God. Otherwise, Abraham would have most likely worshiped the Anunnaki/Teraphim as his father Terah had. By the way, the clay figurines of the serpent men and women we saw earlier, were, I believe, examples of the Teraphim that Terah worshiped. The word Teraphim means ‘earth spirits’. Some very specific facts are related about the Davidic Fisher King line Mark Pinkham;
“One of Murrugan’s Kundalini lineages was taken west to the Middle East, where it culminated in the birth of one of the greatest Kundalini Masters of all time, John the Baptist, who was known by his people, the Mandeans, as the “Fisher of Souls”. John was the fountain head from which numerous Kundalini lineages eventually spread throughout the West via his foremost disciples, which included Jesus Christ and the Gnostic Master Simon Magus. One of John’s most empowered lineages, the Johannite Cupholders, moved from John to Jesus, and then to John the Apostle, and was later transmitted along a line of Knights Templar Grand masters beginning in the 12th century. The Templars carried the Johannite lineage back to their native Europe, after which they helped spawn a constellation of Kundalini focused European secret societies that included the Freemasons, Rosicrucian’s and the Illuminati.”
I tell my family that we have Asian ancestry and they look at me like I have lost my mind. I even have a bone formation in my mouth that a dentist said was only found among Asians. Probably our most recent Asian infusion came from the Aesir who migrated westward with the Fisher King Odin. In Asia they were known as the Yngling or Ynglingeaett dynasty. This dynasty was a pre-cursor to the Ulvungar dynasty. The story goes that Odin left one of his sons in different locations along the way to establish settlements. One author said that Odin was Anu – one of the Anunnaki – who was the father of Enlil and Ea/Enki.
From the Black Sea area, one of our lineages were the Sicambrians, who intermarried with the Scythians who were nomadic horse riding people from Asia and the Near East. They made their way westward and are now western Europeans and Americans. The author relates that the Scythians were worshipers of the Fisher King Neptune of Atlantis. The Scythians separated into tribes and were known as the Alans, Franks, Visigoths, Goths, Saxons, Alemanni, and probably many others. All these examples are just some of the actual lineages. These are lines I have seen in my own family, however, there were other Grail dynasties that were separate from mine. If it’s true that only Noah’s family lived after the Flood, then the original twelve dynasties were narrowed down to one, which would have then went on to have many sub-lineages.
So now we come to the question; did the Davidic Grail line die out? In the following scripture from the Gospel of the Holy Twelve, Lection 66, Jesus says; “Again I say unto you, I and my Bride are one, even as Maria Magdalena, whom I have chosen and sanctified unto myself as a type, is one with me; I and my Church are one. And the Church is the Elect of humanity for the salvation of all.” When Jesus says that to him, Maria Magdalena is his bride and also a type, he is speaking of the archetypal image that she is. Just as he is the Royal Bridegroom archetype, she is the Royal Bride. Something important to consider when thinking about the question of whether Jesus and Mary Magdalene were married, is to take into consideration the times and social mores of the era in which they lived. First of all, women were considered second class citizens. They had no rights and as far as the Jews were concerned, Eve was the cause of all the woe in the world, therefore all women were condemned for this reason. A woman would not talk to a man they didn’t know. Look at some of the Middle Eastern countries today and you will get a good idea of what Palestine was like in those days. A woman would not touch the head and feet of a man she wasn’t married to, as Mary did when she anointed Jesus. She would not have cleaned and anointed the dead body of a man she was not married to – something that Mary Magdalene was said to have done to the body of Jesus.
As far as ‘proof’ of Jesus and Mary Magdalene’s marriage and family, the church father Eusebius, quoting Julius Africanus, talks of the Desposyni and calls them; “The descendants of the Master” – not descendants of the Master’s family. Our family has faithfully recorded their genealogies for several thousand years. I believe the descendants of Jesus and Mary Magdalene kept track of theirs. My Welsh ancestors from Gwynedd brought several large volumes of their detailed family lines with them when they came to America. The following relates information on the bloodline in early Briton/Wales. From the book The Holy Kingdom the Quest for the Real King Arthur;
“The King List of Owain, the son of Hywell Dda, turns out to be, as on other occasions, an important document for tracing the Joseph of Arimathea connection. List 1 traces back to Abatlac, son of Amalech. Here there is a note that says in Latin: Amalech, qui fuit Beli magni filius et Anna mater jesu, quae dicitur esse consobrina maria Virginia, matris Domini nostri Jesu Christi” This translates as Amalech, who was the son of Beli the great and Anna his mother, of whom they say the Virgin Mary, mother of our Lord Jesus Christ, to be a blood-relative.
List 10 presents a different line to Owains tree, but still terminating in Anna, going back to “Eudos, son of Eudelen, son of Aballac, son of Beli and Anna. …More information on this matter is supplied in the genealogies of St. Cadoc, a sixth century British saint and the son of Gwynlliw by Gwladys, a daughter of Brycham of Brecon. On his father’s side, the tree traces back to Baallad son of Aballach, son of Beli, son of Anna. We may therefore assume that Baallad is a brother of the Eudelen mentioned in list 10 of Owen. St. Cadoc’s mother’s tree is more provocative still. It goes back to Battled, son of Aballach, son of Beli and terminates with the Virgin Mary herself.”
The author of The God Kings of Outremer says that there were at least three, “…well-known and authentic lines of legitimate blood descendants from Jesus own family.” One was from Joachim and Anna, Mary’s parents, another from Mary’s cousin Elizabeth through her son John ‘the Baptist’, and one from Cleophas and his wife, who was a cousin of Mary. Many people today define Jews as people whose mothers are Jewish. I believe the reason for this is because the Davidic line, or possibly even the entire line of Judah, at one point, only consisted of two sisters. They were the daughters of King Zedekiah who escaped to Egypt and Ireland with the prophet Jeremiah when Zedekiah and his sons were killed. Therefore the Davidic lineage is maternal. I believe that’s why it’s said that descendants of Jesus mother Mary are the royal Davidic line of Israel – the Desposyni. The author states that this information came from the book by Malachi Martin, The Decline and Fall of the Roman Church, which was written by a former priest, who had access to the Vatican library.
Hugh Montgomery, author of The God Kings of Outremer makes a good case for Mary Magdalene’s having been the daughter of John the Baptist. He says that Dr. Hugh Sinclair had come to the same conclusion some forty years earlier. They both see in John’s line a connection to the royal Petran Dynasty, the Sabeans/Nabateans. Montgomery does a good job of sleuthing and presenting his case for there being several children of Jesus, from both his first marriage and his marriage to Mary Magdalene. Montgomery details at least four brothers and two sisters of Jesus as well. The following is taken from that book;
John the Baptist’s line according to Dr. Hugh Sinclair.
(Black line of Nabatea and Pharaohs)
Zacharias & Elizabeth
John the Baptist and Anya of Petra
Mary Magdalene and Yeshua
3 children: Jacob (Iraq), Ruth and John Martinus
Jacob’s line turned into the Odonic line
Ruth’s line also went into the Odonic line
John Martinus married first Sarah and had a daughter Sarah Bernice
John Martinus married second Muriel and had sons Thomas and German.
Thomas had a son Simon (very dark skinned)
Simon had a son Joseph
Joseph’s line went into the Sinclair’s
Montgomery points out a relationship between the House of Burgundy and either Mary of Bethany or Mary Magdalene – or both, as related in The Golden Legend. The author believes that the lines of the two Mary’s inter-mixed as they descended. The Burgundian connection is important to note because when I went on the Family Tree dna website on the Ulvungar Dynasty page, it was reported that Merovingian remains from Ergolding Bavaria that had been DNA tested, were ‘Burgundian’.
Montgomery has traced the Ulvungar Dynasty to Ramesses I and Seti I, his son by Queen Sitre, who were founders of the 19th Dynasty of Egypt (1342-1197 BC). He says that the Hyksos, who were the Habiru of the Nile Delta, took Seth as their main god. He points out that Seth, or Seti I was given as wives or concubines Anat and Astarte also known as Asherah who were both war goddesses from the Syria-Palestine area. Asherah was also known as the Queen of Heaven, spouse of Yahweh. Astarte, as I pointed out earlier was also known as Queen Esther in the Bible. At that time, the ruling dynasty of Babylon, were the Kassites. The first Kassite king was called Iddina or Odin. The royal families of Egypt and Babylon inter-married at that time. Shortly thereafter, the Kassite dynasty was overthrown and it was at that time that Odin and all his people migrated in a northwesterly direction and eventually became the Goths of Scandinavia, who would later become known as the Vikings and Ulvungar Dynasty.
Montgomery stated that another researcher had traced the Ulvungar dynasty back to a ‘Seth’. He said that it was possible that the Seth referred to was the Biblical Seth, ancestor of Noah. He states that “Rashi (Rabbi Shlomo Yitzhaqi) refers to Seth as “…the father of Noah and the ancestor of all of the generations of the Tzaddikim, the righteous ones.” Montgomery wrote that it occurred to him that the Egyptian Seth and Biblical Seth may be the same man. He cites a document that shows Mary of Bethany as a priestess of Isis.
The Tribe of Benjamin – who were Mary’s ancestors, were mercenary warriors of the Pharaoh and lived on Elephantine Island in Egypt. They were the king’s personal guard. It was on this island that the Zadokite Temple was built by Onias who was of the exiled true High Priests line of Israel. The Essenes in all lands considered this to be their main Temple.
Hugh Montgomery wrote that the period from 1100-1133 was the high point of the Ulvungar dynasty. At that time, they ruled Scandinavia, Russia, Normandy, England, Southern Italy, Sicily, North Africa and Outremer, a name for the ‘Holy Lands’ regained during the Crusades. They even had their own man installed as Pope during that period! I have read that the ‘good’ side of our family had three or four men as Popes. From what I can tell, some of that was probably done through subterfuge, but there were also alliances and even inter-marriage into the (un)-Holy Roman Empire.
Montgomery also found a link between the bloodline and the Herodian dynasty. Considering the history between our family and the Herodian line in Palestine this wouldn’t seem very likely, but there is a story of a Herodian who, when he was young, was told by an Essene prophet that he would one day be a king. This came true, so that Herodian always favored the Essenes. We also learned that there was a tie-in with John the Baptist’s family and Herod who had married King Aretas daughter who was John the Baptist’s sister in law. There is also a story of Mary Magdalene seeking to escape Palestine and appealing to Herod Agrippa’s son, Herod Agrippa the II for help. The younger Herod Agrippa had been tutored by Saul/Paul. Paul at that time was not a champion of Jesus because of Jesus’ reformation of the religion, but did ask his former student to protect Mary. The reason Mary went to Gaul (France) is that Herod Agrippa II’s relatives Herod Antipas and his brother Archelaus had been sent there in exile and had a large estate there. The Herodian’s and the family of John the Baptist were joined in a marriage of political expedience. It seems it was a marriage that may have contributed to the death of John the Baptist and possibly saved the life of Mary Magdalene. We know from the Bible that Saul/Paul was related to the Herodian’s and Montgomery says that a daughter of Jesus and Mary of Bethany and the Apostle Saul/Paul were married.
The authors of the book Rex Deus the True Mystery of Rennes-le-Chateau and the Dynasty of Jesus wrote that documents exist, called the Rex Deus Sagas, which relate the following;
“The children of Jesus were parted in an attempt to ensure their security and the continuation of his bloodline. James, his two and a half year old son, was entrusted to the care of Judas Thomas Didymus, Jesus’ twin brother. They sought immediate sanctuary with King Abgar of Edessa, who was a supporter of Jesus. Mary Magdalene, who was pregnant at the time, fled in the opposite direction, to a refuge of comparative safety among a community whose silence and protection could be relied upon, the Therapeutae in Egypt. Legend tells us that Joseph of Arimathea, a wealthy merchant, had the contacts and resources necessary to effect an immediate escape.
…After an unspecified period in Edessa, James, in the care of his uncle, traveled to the Celt-Iberian settlements in the vicinity of the present-day city of Compostela in the north-west of Spain. James’ age when he first arrived in Spain is not immediately clear from the version of the Rex Deus sagas that were recounted to us, nor are the full details of his later travels. It is with Joseph of Arimathea, but the Rex Deus legends recount that he died in Spain. Could it be that his visit by James the son of the Messiah was the real foundation for the later legends that James the Apostle visited the Iberian Peninsula? It would be ironic indeed if all the devout and orthodox pilgrims who visit Compostela and kneel in front of the tomb of the Apostle are in fact unknowingly venerating the child of a marriage that the Church denies ever took place.”
That book’s authors go on to say that there were four strands of early transmission of the bloodline in Rome, Provence, Spain and Britain. I don’t know if this is an indication of four children or not. Laurence Gardner attributes to Jesus and Mary Magdalene a daughter Tamar, a son Jesus II also called Justus, and another son, Josephes ha Rama Theo. Gardner explains that ‘ha Rama Theo’ is a title that has gotten re-identified as a place name, i.e. Arimathea, but means ‘Of the Highest of God’. ‘Ra’ is an Egyptian term for ‘God’. I have also seen the name Michael attributed to one of their sons, but this was most likely a title as the office holders in the dynasty took the names of the archangels.
There are varying stories about how many children Jesus and Mary Magdalene might have had. I have seen anywhere from one to three. I think there’s confusion because there are children of two different Mary’s. One of Jesus and Mary Magdalene’s sons took a vow of abstinence and didn’t marry or produce heirs. I’ve not tried to trace the separate lines through history, but as far as the Merovingian line goes, at one point, there was only one male named Dagobert who, under an assumed name, continued the Merovingian lineage in the Languedoc area of southern France. This narrowed down the gene pool as far as the Merovingian line goes, but I still believe there are probably millions of descendants of Jesus and Mary Magdalene today. Pocahontas only had one son circa 1625. Historians believe there are tens of thousands of descendants of Pocahontas living today. Giving the greater immensity in time we can see that there could easily be millions of descendants of Jesus and Mary Magdalene today. Laurence Gardner claims that the Merovingians were related to Jesus family through Jesus brother James, but Hugh Montgomery cites a document titled ‘The House of Bethany’ which shows a descent from Jesus and Mary of Bethany, who I believe to be Jesus’ first wife. He cites a daughter Miriam who married Sigismundus, which I am pretty sure is another name for Saul/Paul. Miriam most likely was a dynastic name and not her actual name. As the men took the names of the archangels as titles, the women had theirs as well. This line descends to a Maria who was the mother of Clodomir, who fathered Merovee – the father of the Merovingians.
In the Jeshua channelings, where Jeshua is talking to Lightworkers, he makes the statement that the Light workers were direct descendants of the Apostles. I got the feeling that he may have meant that literally. Hugh Montgomery makes an interesting summary statement in his God Kings of Outremer book;
“I and my colleague Dr. Margaret Tottle-Smith have shown that Jesus himself was one of the Elchasai and that he was party to a hidden tradition, which included the use of the language of the Buddha. That the families of the Odonic God-Kings and the God-Kings of Israel merged into the House of Brocus with the marriage of Maria to Ataulf, and we have been able to tentatively identify the missing generation within the Elchasaic line as follows: Jeshua and Miriam of Bethany to their daughter and Sigismundus to Ruth and Osmeus, to Thomas, to Simeon (of the skin so dark), Joseph, Jonathon, the two Martha’s, Jacob (who was one of the delegates to Pope Sylvester in 318 AD), to Joseph, to John Cassian (who preached to Alaric and Ataulf) and then to Maria and Ataulf.”
Montgomery found evidence of at least one child with Mary of Bethany. Some think Mary of Bethany and Mary Magdalene were the same person. According to Montgomery, there’s a legend stemming from the first century that tells of Mary Magdalene’s arrival in Southern France in 44 C.E. The legend relates that she was accompanied by Mary Jacob, wife of Cleophas, who was a cousin of Jesus, a young girl and Joseph of Arimathea. The author states that their arrival, “is recorded in The Acts of Magdalene and the ancient manuscript History of England which is in the Vatican archives.” He then gives us some interesting information; “St. Mary Jacob was a Nazarene priestess, who became better known in Europe as Mary the Gypsy or Mary the Egyptian. In England her cult was widespread in medieval times and her Oath of Wedlock was referred to as the Merrie. She was said to be the origin of Maid Marian in the Robin Hood legends. There is to this day, a yearly festival celebrating this group’s arrival in France.” Do you see what I mean about our family history being woven into fairy tales and folklore?
From Celt, Druid and Culdee by Isabel Hill Elder;
“The universally held belief that the British are a mixed race has prevailed during many centuries; this belief, however, is now fading out of the scientific mind and giving place to the exact opposite. Britons, Celts, Gaels, Anglo-Saxons, Danes and Normans when warring with each other were kinsmen shedding kindred blood. The British prince, Caradoc, in maintaining his descent from illustrious ancestors, could bring from the clan records evidence of his pedigree; in those remote times genealogies were guarded with extreme care and recorded with exactitude by the herald-bard of each clan. On the public reception of a child, at the age of fifteen, into the clan, his genealogy was proclaimed and challengers of it commanded to come forward. Pedigree and inheritance were so identified in the ancient British code that an heir even in the ninth descent could redeem at a valuation by jury any portion of an estate with which his forefathers had been compelled to part.”
DNA studies have proven this author’s words to be true. The British Isles are some 97% male haplo-group R1b. They are all ‘Isaac’s sons’.
Manly Hall, author of The Secret Teachings of All Ages speaks of an unfamiliar understanding of the Grail stories;
“In the personality of Arthur is to be found a new form of the ever-recurrent cosmic myth. The prince of Britain is the sun, his knights are the zodiac, and his flashing sword may be the sun’s ray with which he fights and vanquishes the dragons of darkness or it may represent the Earth’s axis. Arthur’s Round Table is the universe; the Siege Perilous the throne of the perfect man. In its terrestrial sense, Arthur was the Grand Master of a secret Christian-Masonic brotherhood of philosophic mystics who termed themselves Knights. Arthur received the exalted position of Grand Master of these Knights because he had faithfully accomplished the withdrawal of the sword (spirit) from the anvil of the base metals (his lower nature). As invariably happens, the historical Arthur soon was confused with the allegories and myths of his order until now the two are inseparable. …..The body of the historical Arthur was probably interred at Glastonbury Abbey, a building closely identified with the mystic rites of both the Grail and the Arthurian Cycle. The medieval Rosicrucian’s were undoubtedly in possession of the true secret of the Arthurian Cycle and the Grail legend, much of their symbolism having been incorporated into that order. Though the most obvious of all keys to the Christos mystery, the Grail legend has received the least consideration.”
And from the author of Guardians of the Holy Grail;
“In Robert de Boron’s poem, Galahad is said to be Joseph of Arimathea’s son – although the identity of the knight’s mother is unclear. And the Queste del Saint Graal calls Galahad, like Jesus, a scion of the house of David and identifies Galahad with Jesus himself. Indeed, the very name Galahad, according to modern scholars, derives from the name Gilead, which was deemed a mystical designation for Jesus.”
We saw in the Gospel of the Holy Twelve that Jesus’ father Joseph was still alive after Jesus resurrection. Could it be that his father Joseph was Joseph of Arimathea, or ‘ha Rama Theo’?
From Hidden Wisdom Secrets of the Western Esoteric Tradition;
“Both King Louis and Count Hugh were members of a mysterious and secretive group of families known as Rex Deus. They claim to be the direct lineal descendants of the twenty-four ma’madot, the high priestly families of biblical Israel, direct descendants of Zadok the priest the true heirs to the Hebraic/Egyptian Gnostic and initiatory tradition. …speaking of Grail stories; these stories tell, in an allegorical way, of the search for enlightenment. Under the guise of describing a search for a holy relic, supposedly the cup or chalice used by Joseph of Arimathea to collect Jesus blood after the crucifixion, the stories reveal, in coded form, the pathway of initiation taught by Jesus.”
The author of The Knights of the Holy Grail puts things in perspective;
“The two principal Grail romances carry coded clues to a heretical belief system embedded within them that contradict the dogmas of the Church. The King of the Grail castle, the wounded Fisher King, imperfectly serves his impoverished realm just as the usurpers of the true teachings of Jesus, those who lead the Christian Church, despoil the spiritual lives of the flock they claim to serve. When someone pure enough to see the Grail restores the Fisher King to full health, his wasted kingdom will be restored. Likewise, when the true teachings of Jesus triumph over greed, lies, and distortion the dream of heaven on Earth will become a reality.”
Some of the following is paraphrased from Bloodline of the Holy Grail;
Merlin was actually a long-held Druidic title of the Seer to the King, not just one historic character. The familiar historical Merlin however, was Emry’s of Powys in Wales. Before him, the position was held by Taliesin the Bard who was a husband of Viviane I del Acqs. King Arthur’s father was King Aedan mac Gabran of Scots who held the title of Pendragon. Aedan’s mother was Lluan of Brecknock and she was descended from Joseph of Arimathea. Arthur was made commander of the British forces on his sixteenth birthday in 575. He was later anointed High King of the Britons. In our family, Kings and Queens did not rule countries – they ruled people. In fact, ‘rule’ is probably not a good word as their role was to oversee the welfare of the people. Arthur’s mother Ygerna del Acqs, was made the High Queen of the Celtic Kingdoms, a position granted by the Celtic Church. Ygerna’s mother Viviane I, was the dynastic Queen of Burgundian Avallon. The Burgundians were a tribe with marital ties to the Merovingians, as we learned previously.
Laurence Gardner makes the statement that Arthur’s father, King Aedan was a Celtic Church Christian “of the Sacred Kindred of St. Columba.” He says that the Sacred Kindred was, “distinctly grounded in the Nazarene tradition,” but also incorporated some druidic and pagan ritual. He goes on to write about the disturbance caused within the Celtic church because – in his words, Arthur “Became obsessed with Roman Christianity.” Evidently this led to a breakdown in the once conjoined lands of Wales, Stratchclude and Dumnonia. Shortly thereafter, the kingdom fell to the Anglo Saxons. This signaled the end to over six hundred years of the Celtic kingdom under the Pendragons. The last Pendragon was a direct ancestor of mine, Cadwaladr of Wales, who was twenty sixth in line from Joseph of Arimathea. The marriage of Ygerna and King Aedan brought together the lineages of Joseph of Arimathea and Jesus once again for the first time in 350 years. This is the importance of Arthur in the Grail legends, he was ‘dually Desposynic.’ The two lines were the Arimathean and Christic. Arthur’s half-sister Morgaine married King Urien of Rheged and Gowrie who is known as Urien of Gore in the Arthurian Grail Romances. According to Gardner, Morgaine was a Celtic High Priestess with prophetic and healing powers. Morgaine’s Avallonian Dynasty was perpetuated in the female line. Gardner relates that;
“It is apparent from the annals of saintly genealogy and bardic pedigree that the Messianic line of the Sangreal came into Britain from first century Gaul. In the Lord’s Vineyard the line flourished to become the Princely House of Wales and from this early root stemmed the Gwyr-y-Gogledd chiefs of the northern regions. In parallel, another branch of the Vine conjoined with the great kings of Camulod and Siluria. It was by no chance that Prince Linus, son of Caractacus, (Caradoc) became the first Bishop of Rome. Neither was it a fluke of circumstance that Helena daughter of Britain’s Coel II married Emperor Constantius. By way of this alliance Rome was attached to the Judean royal succession which it had tried so hard to suppress by other means. St. Helena’s son was Constantine the Great and having a Celtic Christian mother of a Desposynic line, he was not slow to proclaim himself the true Messiah, even though his father’s predecessors had been savage persecutors of the Christian movement.”
Those Gwyr-y-Godledd chiefs were the rulers of Gwynedd, whose descendants would move to Pennsylvania many centuries later. The kingdom of Camulod was later known as Camelot. The author of The Magdalene Legacy wrote that Archbishop Rabanus Maurus born circa 780, wrote a manuscript titled The Life of Mary Magdalene. In his manuscript, he tells how Mary, Martha, and their brother Simon-Lazarus and several others, made their way by boat on the Mediterranean Sea until they arrived in the city of Marseilles in what was then Gaul and is now France. To quote;
“The libraries of Paris contain a number of manuscripts even older than that of Rabanus Maurus, which bear witness to Mary’s mission in Provence. The story is mentioned in a hymn of the AD 600’s that was republished in the records of the Acta Sanctorum by the Jesuit, Jean Bolland, in the 17th century. Individual documents containing aspects of the story date back to the early 4th century, and a century before that the Cassianites were installed at La Sainte-Baume in the era of the Fisher Kings of Gaul, before Merovingian times. The 9th century manuscript entitled Vita emeritica beatae Maria Magdalenae is reckoned to be copied from a Greek original from the 2nd century, possibly written by Hegesippus. (Mary buried in the Chapel of St. Maximus in AD 63).
These various records show that Jesus’ sisters, Sarah-Salome and Mary Jacob Cleophas, Helena-Salome, the consort of Simon-Lazarus, and a young girl, accompanied Mary Magdalene and Joseph. Simon-Lazarus is the brother of Mary Magdalene and Martha and is the Lazarus whom Jesus raised from the dead. A consort is a royal spouse, so it’s quite possible that Simon-Lazarus was also from a royal line, and I believe that would have been from the Benjamite King Saul of ancient Israel. Jesus sisters and Helena-Salome are buried in the crypt of Les Saintes Maries de la Mer in the Camargue. Gardner relates;
“In AD 44, Mary gave birth to her second son, and there is a specific reference to this in the New Testament: “The word of God grew and multiplied.” (Acts 12:24) This son was the all-important Grail Child and, in recognition of his grandfather, he was called Josephes. Having fulfilled his dynastic obligation to father two sons, Jesus was duly released from restrictions and was able to lead a normal life once more. From AD 46, his elder son, Jesus II then aged nine, was schooled in Caesarea. Three years later, he underwent the ceremony of his community birth in Provence. In accordance with custom, he would have been symbolically born again from his mother’s womb at the age of twelve. In AD 53, Jesus junior was officially proclaimed Crown Prince at the synagogue in Corinth and duly received the Davidic Crown Prince’s title of ‘Justus’ (the Righteous). He thereby formally succeeded his uncle, James the Just, as the kingly heir. Having reached the sovereign majority age of 16, Jesus Justus also became the Chief Nazarite gaining entitlement to the black robe of that office – as worn by the priests of Isis, the universal Mother Goddess.”
From Rex Deus the True Mystery of Rennes-le-Chateau and the Dynasty of Jesus;
“There is evidence to suggest that the royal bloodline of Jesus and Mary Magdalene eventually flowed in the veins of the Merovingian monarchs of France. The name Merovingian may itself be a linguistic fossil. The lore surrounding the royal family of the Franks mentions an ancestor ‘Merovee.’ But the word Merovingian breaks down phonetically into syllables that we can easily recognize: mer and vin, Mary and the vine. Broken down this way, it may be seen to allude to the ‘vine of Mary’ or perhaps the ‘vine of the Mother.’ The royal emblem of the Merovingian King Clovis was the fleur-de-lis (the iris). The Latin name for the iris flower, which grows wild in counties of the Middle East, is gladiolus, or ‘small sword.’ The trefoil fleur-de-lis of the royal house of France is a masculine symbol. In fact, it is a graphic image of the covenant of circumcision in which are inherent all the promises of God to Israel and to the House of David.
Not only was the royal line trying to live inconspicuously during this period, but the Roman church, in a ploy to take over the dynastic apostleship from the family of Jesus, was intentionally masking the identity of Jesus family in the Bible. Jesus brother James was known for his piety and righteousness and held in great esteem. The Catholics labeled him as “James the Less’. They even adopted the notion that Jesus was celibate so that a direct line of descent from Jesus was not possible.”
From St. Mary Magdalene the Gnostic Tradition of the Holy Bride by Tau Malachi we learn;
“The conception of St. Michael, it is generally held that Our Lady and Our Lord conceived St. Michael, their son and the heir of the lineage of royal blood, on the eve of the Shabbat the week before the drama of the Passion and Crucifixion. Thus, at the Crucifixion and Resurrection, and while the Risen Savior appeared until the time of the final Ascension, Lady Mary was with child, having St. Michael in her womb. The Holy Bride had become the Holy Mother, the mother of a supernal humanity. Jesus blood and flesh given over to the Demiurges and Archons as ransom for those souls he sought to liberate from their dominion and for the sake of binding the serpent in cessation. Thus with Him, she was making a holy sanctuary for the souls of the Elect throughout time who might cleave to the Anointed and also become the Anointed.”
I find it intriguing that the author said that Mary and Jesus were making a holy sanctuary for the souls of the Elect through their act of conceiving St. Michael. I believed long before I read that book that the souls of the Elect were in the descendants of Jesus and Mary Magdalene. He calls us a supernal humanity. I’m not sure I am living up to that description! The reference to ‘also become the Anointed’ refers to what is probably our most important reason for incarnating into the Earth at this time. At some point, simultaneously, an anointing of the Holy Spirit power will come upon us. We will be the Christ’s of this era. We will have our own Day of Pentecost. We will tell people that they too will one day be capable of doing everything they see us do – if they turn to God and choose to evolve in God Consciousness.
Tex Marrs, the author of Rule by Secrecy says this about the Rex Deus bloodline;
“The author Lawrence Gardner as an internationally recognized expert of sovereign and chivalric genealogy was permitted to study the private records of thirty-three European royal families. He confirmed that the Merovingian’s were related to Jesus, but through his brother James, who Gardner claimed was the same person as Joseph of Arimathea. …It was never any secret…for the majority of these people (European Royalty) that Jesus was married and that Jesus had heirs, because it is written as such in very many family archives…The published papers of Mary, Queen of Scots talk about it at length. The papers of James II of England, who wasn’t deposed until 1688, talk of it at length.”
He goes on to quote Gardner who says that he was allowed access to documents that were hundreds of years old which, in 1128, the Knights Templar brought out and confronted the Church establishment with. It was shortly after this that the Templars institutions were raided and the Templars jailed and tortured. The Templars had been forewarned and most had escaped by boat to Scotland. The Templars were re-formed there into Scottish Rite Freemasonry.
There were various lines in Briton and Wales through the ages that stemmed from the lineage of Joseph of Arimathea. The rulers of Gwynedd in Wales were one of them. The Plantagenet’s and Tudors were others. We also had family lines in the other British Isles such as the Stuarts in Scotland. The Odinic line was in Scandinavia before moving to France and Britain. A later infusion of Eastern Jewish blood was through Makhir who ruled in Septimania – an independent Jewish state in southern France. Makhir was originally the Jewish Exilarch in Babylon. The Jews flourished during their captivity there and many didn’t leave when they were given their freedom. It will probably come as a surprise to many readers to learn that the prophet Muhammad was a descendant of Jesus brother Simon – so he too was Rex Deus.
There is a story that relates that members of Rex Deus went to Pope Sylvester to try and assert their hereditary right to lead and practice the form of the ancient religion transmitted to them by Jesus. The Pope told them that they and their teachings had no place in the new Christian order and that the teachings of Jesus had been superseded by Church doctrine! That, unfortunately still remains true. It seems one point of contention between our family and the Catholic Church was the doctrine of Jesus divinity, which evidently our family found blasphemous. I think it all comes back to separating the soul who was Jesus the man and the soul who ‘overshadowed’ Jesus, the Logos, the Son of God. If they were talking about Jesus the man, then he wasn’t equal to God, he was exactly the same as you and I. Technically the Logos is one third a part of God and was actually the third realization of God. The Father and Mother came before the son – so maybe that’s why they don’t believe Jesus and God are equal. I find nothing blasphemous in saying that either is true. Everyone and everything is God. It’s all God!
Early in my research I saw on the internet that there had been a scientific DNA analysis done on some remains of Merovingian’s from the Court of Merovech who lived circa 670 C.E. I had already had some testing done on my dad’s DNA so I compared it with the results listed in the report and came up with a one hundred percent match. However, there were many more ‘locus’ tested on the Merovingian remains than I had tested on my dad’s DNA, so I sent off another sample to be tested so that I would be able to compare every marker tested in the study. It took several weeks for the results to come back. I can truly say that there was not a scintilla of doubt in my mind that my dad’s DNA would show descent from the test subjects. I was not disappointed. The testing proved that my dad descended from either of two of the subjects, who were said to be brothers. As of November 2012 the report can still be found online at; www.cmj.hr/2009/50/3/19480023.htm
The scans I made of the study results are too light and in too small of print to be practical to add to the even smaller pages of a post. I have found other websites that have copied and pasted the results, so hopefully they will be available in the future. Just type ‘Merovingian DNA Ergolding Bavaria’ into your search engine and you should find one.
“After these things I will return and will rebuild David’s tent which has fallen down. I will rebuild its ruins and set it up again. So that those who are left of mankind may seek the Lord even all the Gentiles who are called by my name, says the Lord who does these things, which have been known from long ago.” Acts 15:16-18
Some believe that this verse refers to Jesus rebuilding David’s tent two thousand years ago and then our ministry to the Gentiles for the last two thousand years. Jesus did re-establish David’s tent then, and we have been witnessing to the ‘Gentiles’ since then as well. However, the very important words ‘those who are left of mankind’ speaks of a day which, thankfully, will not be, as our timeline has changed. We no longer are faced with the loss of the majority of humankind.
And to my brothers and sisters I ask, how can we rebuild David’s tent if we deny that we are of David’s household?